/Lang (EN-US) /Pg 28 0 R << ), op. /S /Link 355 0 R 356 0 R 357 0 R 358 0 R 359 0 R 360 0 R 361 0 R 362 0 R 363 0 R 190 0 R << /P 505 0 R /S /Reference /Contents [415 0 R 416 0 R 417 0 R] /P 12 0 R /Parent 9 0 R 336 0 obj /Pg 15 0 R /K 3 /P 12 0 R /P 164 0 R In addition, if the motion is made by a former client, attorneys should consider providing notice of a potential circumstance to their legal malpractice insurer. 105 0 obj 20 0 obj /Rotate 0 /K 36 endobj >> >> /P 508 0 R /P 12 0 R << << /Pg 19 0 R << endobj /K 3 << >> 155 0 obj /Rotate 0 /K [6 323 0 R 8] 11 [110 0 R 111 0 R 112 0 R 113 0 R 114 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R >> 145 0 obj /P 12 0 R /Pg 45 0 R /P 12 0 R 274 0 obj /S /P /S /P stream >> /S /P Subscribe to Justia's Free Newsletters featuring summaries of federal and state court opinions. /S /P /S /P /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Resources 379 0 R << T/CT stated that the motion was "'almost by definition untimely under these circumstances.'" C.H. /Annots [423 0 R 424 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) /S /P PDF state of maryland /Pg 20 0 R By far the majority of successful motions to disqualify are brought on the basis of a conflict of interest with a former or concurrent client or imputation, but attorneys should also be aware that successful motions to disqualify have been brought on the following bases, among others: (1) lawyer as witness, (2) appearance of impropriety, (3) receipt of confidential data, (4) personal interest, (5) violation of the no contact rules, and (6) misconduct with a witness. /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 31 0 R /S /P /S /P /Pg 43 0 R /Pg 46 0 R << /Pg 15 0 R endobj /S /P 278 0 R 279 0 R 278 0 R null 280 0 R 281 0 R 280 0 R null 282 0 R 283 0 R In New York, that motion requires: the existence of a prior attorney-client relationship between the moving party and opposing counsel. PDF Affidavit of Counsel in Support of Britax's Response to Order Regarding /Pg 19 0 R << /S /P 1. endobj 116 0 obj << /Pg 16 0 R /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R 302 0 R null] 302 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /K 5 /StructParents 9 /S /P /K 17 >> endobj /DropCap /Figure /K 34 /Lang (EN-US) RESPONSE to Motion re 31 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Xcentric Ventures, LLC for Xcentric Ventures, LLC et al v. Stanley et al :: Justia Dockets & Filings Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona District Court Xcentric Ventures, LLC et al v. Stanley et al Filing 39 Xcentric Ventures, LLC et al v. Stanley et al Filing 39 << /K 31 /Lang (EN-US) Second, take effective steps to mitigate, if not eliminate, risks that a former clients confidences and secrets might be accessible to attorneys working on a matter involving the former client. /Pg 32 0 R /S /H1 0 << << << Background "Florida courts have held that disqualification of counsel "is an extraordinary remedy and should only be resorted to sparingly." (Manning v. Cooper (2008) 981 So.2d 668, 670 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (quoting Alexander v. /P 506 0 R /Pg 37 0 R 21 [144 0 R 145 0 R 146 0 R 147 0 R 148 0 R] /StructParents 17 Such motions are sometimes followed by either a grievance or a legal malpractice claim. << /P 12 0 R /Pg 42 0 R << 262 0 obj >> 326 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R /S /P endobj /S /P 438 0 obj << endobj /Lang (EN-US) >> 266 0 obj 210 0 obj +126:*l1%HQa7m'PfQn /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 27 0 R RESPONSE to Motion re 31 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Xcentric >> endobj /S /Reference 1 0 obj /K 35 /Annots [] /P 12 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Lang (EN-US) endobj endobj >> /K 1 >> << /Pg 18 0 R << /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /K 17 /Kids [30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R 33 0 R 34 0 R] << /K 4 /Lang (EN-US) In recent months, a number of high-profile disqualification motions have been reported. /Pg 15 0 R PDF STATE OF CALIFORNIA GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION /S /P /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /P 123 0 R << 88 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R >> /Pg 17 0 R >> endobj /P 508 0 R endobj /K [14 516 0 R] >> /S /P 198 0 obj /S /P 240 0 obj >> >> /Lang (EN-US) /S /P This motion to disqualify is based on a single and brief telephone call in October 2007 for which there is neither a record nor an estimate of duration by Chinois counsel. << /Lang (EN-US) /Diagram /Figure /P 506 0 R endobj endobj /Lang (EN-US) /K [50 299 0 R 52] endobj /Lang (EN-US) << As the Colorado Supreme Court has noted, [v]iolation of an ethical rule, in itself, is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for disqualification, although there typically must be evidence of a violation or potential violation of attorney ethical proscriptions, such as those centered on the duties of loyalty and fairness or those intended to protect the integrity of the process.8 Often, motions to disqualify turn on the risk that a clients former attorney or law firm might be able to use against the client the confidences or secrets gained during the prior representation. /P 12 0 R /P 4 0 R /K 3 /K 1 /K 0 endobj endobj /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) >> endobj 33 0 obj /Kids [20 0 R 21 0 R 22 0 R 23 0 R 24 0 R] << 206 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) endobj /Pg 44 0 R >> >> endobj endobj /Pg 24 0 R >> /StructParents 32 RESPONSE to Motion re 31 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Xcentric Ventures, LLC(an Arizona Corporation), Ed Magedson(an individual). /S /P /Pg 44 0 R /Lang (EN-US) 365 0 obj /S /Reference disqualify opposing counsel, the present client of the attorney who is the target of the motion,6 and third parties. << /Lang (EN-US) << endobj /Rotate 0 /S /P /K 8 /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R endobj /P 506 0 R Disqualification motions implicate the most important duties that an attorney owes a client: the duties of confidentiality and loyalty. 308 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R /Length 533 0 R /P 506 0 R endobj 284 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 16 0 R >> /S /P 297 0 obj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /K [503 0 R 504 0 R] >> 360 0 obj PDF No. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON PATRICIA LANDES, v /P 505 0 R Upon receiving a motion to disqualify, the attorney should promptly notify the client. 305 0 obj endobj /S /P 107 0 obj 339 0 obj << endobj << Lansing, MI 48909 (517) 335 -7603 . /S /P << endobj >> >> >> endobj << << /K 5 1990); United States v. Brothers, 856 F. Supp. /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R >> /K 8 /Rotate 0 << << 235 0 obj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Pg 18 0 R /K 33 << endobj >> /Pg 36 0 R >> 348 0 obj /P 508 0 R /Pg 16 0 R /K 11 endobj >> endobj /K 6 /Pg 37 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /P 55 0 R /S /P /Pg 20 0 R >> Indeed, even if the attorney does not possess any direct information regarding the present lawsuit or transaction, the client may say that the attorney understands how the client thinks and acts. /Pg 18 0 R The Ethics of Moving to Disqualify Opposing Counsel for Conflict of are satisfied. 6 0 obj /P 508 0 R /S /P /K [14 523 0 R] /Type /Page United States v. Prantil, 764 F.2d 548, 551 (9th Cir. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /S /P /K 2 /K [315 0 R 317 0 R 318 0 R] 97 0 R 98 0 R 99 0 R 100 0 R 101 0 R 102 0 R 103 0 R 104 0 R 105 0 R] /S /P << 325 0 obj 254 0 obj /S /TOCI /Rotate 0 /Type /Page /S /P /Lang (EN-US) A motion to recuse is a legal motion filed in court that says a judge should be disqualified, or removed, from a legal case for a reason listed within CCP 170.1. "response to General Michael T. Flynn's Motion to Disqualify Judge Emmet Sullivan, United States v. Flynn, 17-cr-232 (Doc. endobj /Pg 37 0 R /P 12 0 R /Resources 448 0 R 128 0 obj endobj /S /P 99 0 obj << << /P 531 0 R 27 0 obj /Parent 7 0 R << endobj 153 0 obj /K [6 277 0 R 8] 189 0 obj /P 509 0 R /S /TOCI <<329FC6C22BACB2110A0030BBE330FF7F>]/Prev 482690>> /Lang (EN-US) /K 15 /P 528 0 R 330 0 obj ,"w0:IYbJ!`.^OtX]8Xhyi(< 1+!)CafX>2p1D0UXrA!iP2j\ /Parent 10 0 R endobj 24 0 obj << /K 10 /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Type /Page although Comment 3 to that Rule provides some context: Matters are substantially related for purposes of this Rule if they involve the same transaction or legal dispute or if there otherwise is a substantial risk that confidential factual information as would normally have been obtained in the prior representation would materially advance the clients position in the subsequent matter. /Pg 45 0 R 16.21 et seq. 253 0 R 254 0 R 255 0 R 256 0 R 257 0 R 258 0 R 259 0 R 260 0 R 261 0 R 262 0 R /Pg 17 0 R 260 0 obj 23 [152 0 R 153 0 R 154 0 R 155 0 R] endobj endobj >> << Significantly, the increasing mobility of lateral attorneys (with attorneys rarely spending their entire legal careers at a single law practice or firm) has raised issues that can serve as the basis of a motion to disqualify. << >> 329 0 obj 148 0 obj >> >> << /Lang (EN-US) 6. endobj /S /H1 /S /P /K 5 /Kids [40 0 R 41 0 R 42 0 R 43 0 R 44 0 R 45 0 R 46 0 R] << /P 12 0 R /P 282 0 R He then filed a Motion for Discovery on January 29, 2002, and a Motion for Evidentiary Hearing on February 1, 2002. /P 315 0 R /K 7 On the contrary, a defendant must demonstrate a compelling and legitimate need to do so. /Pg 15 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /K 10 endobj /P 12 0 R Note: Summary Judgment Motions have a 30 day Response period. /Type /Page 0000000016 00000 n 15 316 0 R 16 [127 0 R 128 0 R 129 0 R 130 0 R 131 0 R] /Pg 17 0 R >> 157 0 obj >> endobj 82 0 obj << << endobj /Lang (EN-US) 0000006178 00000 n . >> 10. /Parent 10 0 R /Lang (EN-US) >> /Kids [15 0 R 16 0 R 17 0 R 18 0 R 19 0 R] 131 0 obj /Endnote /Note 249 0 obj /Contents [471 0 R 472 0 R 473 0 R] /Pg 17 0 R 4 [58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R 63 0 R 64 0 R 65 0 R 66 0 R 67 0 R /Pg 16 0 R 322 0 obj << >> PDF Craig Conlon Docket No.: Mon-l-3933-16 Enterprise Mobility Solutions /K 1 << endobj /S /Link The far more common motion to disqualify involves a former client, either of the law firm or of an individual attorney (who may have recently joined the firm). /K [13 311 0 R 15] << >> /K 14 %%EOF /Pg 22 0 R /K 4 120 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /S /P R. Evid. RESPONSE to 70 MOTION to Disqualify Attorney Steve Morris and The Law As the motion describes, the purpose of the Compensation Pilot is to address a financial << /S /P Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. motion to disqualify. 251 0 obj /Contents [425 0 R 426 0 R 427 0 R] endobj << /StructParents 26 /K 19 /Lang (EN-US) /P 508 0 R >> Brennan, No. /Rotate 0 << endobj /Lang (EN-US) << /S /P /Pg 15 0 R << /Pg 45 0 R /P 531 0 R 157 0 R 158 0 R 159 0 R 160 0 R 161 0 R 162 0 R 163 0 R 164 0 R 165 0 R 166 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] endobj startxref /Pg 45 0 R /S /P citation to the law supporting the request. /Pg 29 0 R << /P 12 0 R /K 0 /S /P 13 0 obj /P 531 0 R endobj /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R /K [274 0 R 276 0 R 278 0 R 280 0 R 282 0 R 284 0 R 286 0 R 288 0 R 290 0 R 292 0 R /S /P /S /P /Lang (EN-US) >> >> /Lang (EN-US) endobj /Parent 10 0 R A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. >> 151 0 obj << Co. of Am., No. /P 12 0 R /Type /Page /Lang (EN-US) Smithj46@michigan.gov / PLAINTIFF CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST MICHIGAN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISQUALIFY . endobj You can find 3 available options; typing, drawing, or capturing one. /P 163 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /S /P /Lang (EN-US) 300 0 obj >> /Parent 7 0 R endobj /P 132 0 R /Annots [] /P 12 0 R /Type /Page /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /P 508 0 R According to the Colorado Supreme Court, however, a court may not disqualify counsel on the basis of speculation or conjecture.. Dentons - Four Things to Know About Motions to Disqualify /Lang (EN-US) /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] endobj /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R In 3/19, C.H. 40 326 0 R 41 329 0 R 42 330 0 R] >> >> /S /TOC 185 0 obj /A 520 0 R 25 [158 0 R 159 0 R] /Annots [] << /S /P Moreover, other witnesses are available to testify about the contested facts on which the defendant's Motion is based. 186 0 obj /S /P /S /TOCI /K 2 /S /P /S /Table 229 0 obj /Pg 35 0 R 140 0 obj << << 42 0 obj >> /K 0 /K 1 /Lang (EN-US) 12-1]. /Pg 15 0 R ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Disqualify is GRANTED and Andrew J. Cevasco, Esquire is disqualified pursuant to New Jersey Rule of Professional Conduct 3.7 from serving as legal counsel for the Defendants at the trial in this matter; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to R. 1:5-1(a) that a copy of this Order will be << << Under the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct (Colorado Rules or Colo. RCP), an attorney must safeguard client confidences and secrets, subject to a few exceptions.2 The attorney is also obligated to elevate the clients interests above the interests of the attorney and the law firm. /Chart /Figure >> 26 0 obj /S /P >> /Pg 16 0 R /P 12 0 R /Pg 24 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Type /Page /Pg 38 0 R /A 522 0 R /S /P /Kids [6 0 R 7 0 R 8 0 R 9 0 R 10 0 R 11 0 R] << 197 0 R 198 0 R 199 0 R 200 0 R 201 0 R 202 0 R] /Parent 9 0 R /Pg 15 0 R /RoleMap 14 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 1 [233 0 R 234 0 R 235 0 R 236 0 R 237 0 R 238 0 R 239 0 R 240 0 R 241 0 R 242 0 R /Pg 44 0 R /Lang (EN-US) << endobj /Kids [35 0 R 36 0 R 37 0 R 38 0 R 39 0 R] /P 12 0 R /Pg 44 0 R /K 1 /S /Footnote endobj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /S /Link >> 257 0 obj /P 12 0 R /Type /Pages endobj 79 0 obj >> << 358 0 obj The defendant may not call the prosecutors as witnesses unless there is a compelling need to do so. /P 162 0 R /Pg 16 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /Parent 6 0 R /Lang (EN-US) x+ | /P 12 0 R /S /P >> /Pg 22 0 R Here, as in Brothers, the defendant has other sources of evidence available, namely two FBI agents, that must be exhausted before the prosecutors are called as witnesses.
Deaths In Ocean City, New Jersey, New Homes Under $300k Arlington, Tx, Articles R